New laws on animal slaughter in Belgium may be smoke screens for bigotry against Jews and Muslims.

On New Year’s Day in 2019, part of Belgium put into effect a ban on the way Muslims and Jews slaughter animals. The law declares that the animals must be stunned insensible before they are killed, a practice widely applied in the global food industry but rejected by some observant Muslims and Jews, who insist that their time-honored method of slashing an animal’s neck is mandated by their religion and fully humane.

It should be obvious to any reader even from this brief summary that there is bound to be impassioned debate on the issue. And indeed animal-rights advocates and religious leaders have squared off on social media and the internet, citing volumes of scriptural injunctions and scientific studies.

In fact, Muslims and Jews in Belgium and other countries that ban ritual slaughter can still import halal or kosher meat from other countries, and many Muslim communities do allow some forms of electrical stunning that satisfy civil codes. The debate, moreover, is hardly new. Regulations across the European Union require stunning an animal before slaughter, a practice that generally means either firing a bolt into its brain or an electric shock. Most European countries allow religious exceptions, but several — including Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Denmark and Slovenia — do not.

But on a continent with a long history of anti-Semitism and a newer spread of animosity toward Muslim immigrants, any regulation that appears to discriminate against Jewish or Muslim practices and traditions — circumcision and dress are other examples — is bound to be viewed by the religious as insulting and hostile.

Right-wing politicians in several countries have used controls on such religious practices to press bigoted agendas under the cloak of battling for civil or animal rights. In the Belgian case, the idea for the ban was first raised by Ben Weyts, a right-wing Flemish nationalist who is also responsible for animal welfare in the Flanders regional government, which imposed the ban that took effect last week. A similar ban begins later this year in Wallonia. No ban has been approved for Belgium’s third region, around Brussels.

The pretexts of some politicians does not mean all those who insist on stunning have dubious motives. Animal-rights activists have long campaigned, justifiably and successfully, for the humane treatment of animals destined for the table. Many earnestly believe that slashing the neck of a conscious animal causes more suffering than stunning the animal first.

Yet it is equally true that dietary laws are of enormous importance to people of the Jewish and Muslim faiths. Both stipulate that only an animal in perfect health can be slaughtered and dispute that a stunned animal qualifies. Both also hold that their method of swiftly slicing through the jugular vein and carotid artery with a razor-sharp knife renders an animal unconscious almost immediately.

In the United States, the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act of 1958resolved the difference by declaring the methods of Islam and Judaism to be equally humane to stunning.

Whether that’s so should be a matter of continuing study by the meat and poultry industries, animal scientists, veterinarians and governments. There is no question that the animals we raise for food should be exposed to the least suffering possible, just as there is no question that killing a healthy creature has enormous potential for cruelty.

But those who really care about the welfare of animals should be wary of making common cause with right-wing nationalists whose hostile intent is to make life more difficult for religious minorities. A real conversation on balancing animal rights and religious freedoms can take place only if it is free of hidden bigotry.

 

 

17 thoughts on “New laws on animal slaughter in Belgium may be smoke screens for bigotry against Jews and Muslims.

  1. An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto a friend who has been doing a little homework on this. And he in fact ordered me breakfast because I found it for him… lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending some time to discuss this subject here on your site.

  2. Can I simply say what a relief to uncover someone who actually knows what they are discussing on the net. You certainly understand how to bring a problem to light and make it important. A lot more people really need to read this and understand this side of the story. I can’t believe you are not more popular because you certainly have the gift.

  3. This is a really good tip especially to those new to the blogosphere. Brief but very precise information… Many thanks for sharing this one. A must read post.

  4. Everything is very open with a really clear explanation of the issues. It was truly informative. Your site is useful. Thanks for sharing!

  5. Can I simply say what a relief to find someone that really understands what they’re discussing over the internet. You actually know how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More people must check this out and understand this side of your story. I was surprised that you aren’t more popular because you surely have the gift.

  6. You have made some really good points there. I looked on the internet for more information about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this website.

  7. I’m amazed, I must say. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s equally educative and amusing, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. The problem is something which not enough men and women are speaking intelligently about. I’m very happy I came across this during my search for something regarding this.

  8. You ought to be a part of a contest for one of the highest quality websites online. I’m going to highly recommend this web site!

  9. As a result of Carlitos by accident knocking the Tlāloc statue into his
    carriage inflicting Charles to mistook one of many souvenirs because the statue, the children learn that the statue truly works.
    By 3000 BC, Egypt was utilizing homing pigeons for pigeon post, profiting from a singular high quality of this fowl, which when taken far from
    its nest is able to find its method residence attributable to a particularly
    developed sense of orientation.

  10. This is the right blog for everyone who wishes to understand this topic. You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really will need to…HaHa). You definitely put a fresh spin on a subject that has been discussed for decades. Wonderful stuff, just wonderful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *